Ghana vs South Africa: Remittance costs as a proportion of the amount remitted
Ghana
13.3%
in 2025
South Africa
15.7%
in 2025
Ghana rank
6th
South Africa rank
5th
Remittance costs as a proportion of the amount remitted over time
- Ghana
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 15.7% against 13.3% in Ghana, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Africa ahead.
Ghana ranks 6th and South Africa ranks 5th of 47 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.6% | 16.3% | 2.7% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 7.5% | 14.0% | 6.6% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher remittance costs as a proportion of the amount remitted, Ghana or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 15.7% against 13.3% in Ghana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in remittance costs as a proportion of the amount remitted between Ghana and South Africa?
- 2.4%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and South Africa?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and South Africa rank globally for remittance costs as a proportion of the amount remitted?
- Ghana ranks 6th and South Africa ranks 5th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank – processed by Our World in Data, published as Remittance costs as a proportion of the amount remitted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average remittance costs of sending $200 for a sending country as a proportion of the amount remitted (%).