Georgia vs Malaysia: Regulatory Quality - Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for
Georgia
70.7%
in 2024
Malaysia
70.7%
in 2024
Georgia rank
56th
Malaysia rank
57th
Regulatory Quality - Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for over time
- Georgia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 70.7% against 70.7% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malaysia ahead.
Georgia ranks 56th and Malaysia ranks 57th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.9% | 67.8% | 18.9% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 58.7% | 69.7% | 11.0% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 72.3% | 71.5% | 0.7% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 72.6% | 70.3% | 2.3% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for, Georgia or Malaysia?
- Georgia, at 70.7% against 70.7% in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for between Georgia and Malaysia?
- 0.0%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Malaysia rank globally for regulatory quality - upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for?
- Georgia ranks 56th and Malaysia ranks 57th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Regulatory Quality - Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.