China vs Maldives: Regulatory Quality - Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for
China
58.8%
in 2024
Maldives
58.9%
in 2024
China rank
105th
Maldives rank
102nd
Regulatory Quality - Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for over time
- China
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 58.9% against 58.8% in China, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Maldives ahead.
China ranks 105th and Maldives ranks 102nd of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Maldives in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55.4% | 81.6% | 26.2% | Maldives |
| 2000s | 55.8% | 68.0% | 12.2% | Maldives |
| 2010s | 57.5% | 58.5% | 0.9% | Maldives |
| 2020s | 58.8% | 57.7% | 1.1% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for, China or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 58.9% against 58.8% in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for between China and Maldives?
- 0.1%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Maldives?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do China and Maldives rank globally for regulatory quality - upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for?
- China ranks 105th and Maldives ranks 102nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Regulatory Quality - Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.