Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Regulatory Quality
Tanzania
0.1617 standard error
in 2011
Zimbabwe
0.1617 standard error
in 2011
Tanzania rank
34th
Zimbabwe rank
34th
Regulatory Quality over time
- Tanzania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 0.1617 standard error against 0.1617 standard error in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 standard error.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Tanzania ahead.
Tanzania ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 53 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tanzania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.294 standard error | 0.269 standard error | 0.0249 standard error | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 0.1837 standard error | 0.1792 standard error | 0.0045 standard error | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 0.1617 standard error | 0.1617 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality, Tanzania or Zimbabwe?
- Tanzania, at 0.1617 standard error against 0.1617 standard error in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality between Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
- 0 standard error, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Tanzania and Zimbabwe rank globally for regulatory quality?
- Tanzania ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.