Malawi vs Namibia: Regulatory Quality
Regulatory Quality over time
- Malawi
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.1683 standard error against 0.1678 standard error in Malawi, a difference of 0.0005 standard error.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Namibia ahead.
Malawi ranks 23rd and Namibia ranks 21st of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.294 standard error | 0.294 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.1849 standard error | 0.1849 standard error | 0 standard error | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.1676 standard error | 0.1691 standard error | 0.0015 standard error | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality, Malawi or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.1683 standard error against 0.1678 standard error in Malawi as of 2011.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality between Malawi and Namibia?
- 0.0005 standard error, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Namibia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Malawi and Namibia rank globally for regulatory quality?
- Malawi ranks 23rd and Namibia ranks 21st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.