Malawi vs Mauritius: Regulatory Quality
Regulatory Quality over time
- Malawi
- Mauritius
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.1678 standard error against 0.1645 standard error in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0033 standard error.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritius ahead.
Malawi ranks 23rd and Mauritius ranks 25th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.294 standard error | 0.3977 standard error | 0.1037 standard error | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0.1849 standard error | 0.1922 standard error | 0.0073 standard error | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0.1676 standard error | 0.1655 standard error | 0.0021 standard error | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality, Malawi or Mauritius?
- Malawi, at 0.1678 standard error against 0.1645 standard error in Mauritius as of 2011.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality between Malawi and Mauritius?
- 0.0033 standard error, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Mauritius?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Malawi and Mauritius rank globally for regulatory quality?
- Malawi ranks 23rd and Mauritius ranks 25th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.