Eswatini vs Libya: Regulatory Quality
Eswatini
0.1944 standard error
in 2011
Libya
0.1907 standard error
in 2011
Eswatini rank
8th
Libya rank
10th
Regulatory Quality over time
- Eswatini
- Libya
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.1944 standard error against 0.1907 standard error in Libya, a difference of 0.0037 standard error.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 8th and Libya ranks 10th of 53 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3643 standard error | 0.3276 standard error | 0.0367 standard error | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.2277 standard error | 0.2162 standard error | 0.0114 standard error | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.1946 standard error | 0.1885 standard error | 0.0061 standard error | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality, Eswatini or Libya?
- Eswatini, at 0.1944 standard error against 0.1907 standard error in Libya as of 2011.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality between Eswatini and Libya?
- 0.0037 standard error, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Libya?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Libya rank globally for regulatory quality?
- Eswatini ranks 8th and Libya ranks 10th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.