Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Regulatory Quality
Regulatory Quality over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eswatini
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.1991 standard error against 0.1944 standard error in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0047 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eswatini ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th and Eswatini ranks 8th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3145 standard error | 0.3643 standard error | 0.0498 standard error | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.2183 standard error | 0.2277 standard error | 0.0093 standard error | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.199 standard error | 0.1946 standard error | 0.0044 standard error | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality, Equatorial Guinea or Eswatini?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.1991 standard error against 0.1944 standard error in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality between Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
- 0.0047 standard error, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini rank globally for regulatory quality?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th and Eswatini ranks 8th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.