Djibouti vs Equatorial Guinea: Regulatory Quality
Regulatory Quality over time
- Djibouti
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 0.1991 standard error against 0.1991 standard error in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 5th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th of 53 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3643 standard error | 0.3145 standard error | 0.0498 standard error | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 0.2322 standard error | 0.2183 standard error | 0.0139 standard error | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 0.199 standard error | 0.199 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality, Djibouti or Equatorial Guinea?
- Djibouti, at 0.1991 standard error against 0.1991 standard error in Equatorial Guinea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality between Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0 standard error, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for regulatory quality?
- Djibouti ranks 5th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.