Cote d'Ivoire vs Egypt: Regulatory Quality

Cote d'Ivoire
0.1617 standard error
in 2011
Egypt
0.1617 standard error
in 2011
Cote d'Ivoire rank
34th
Egypt rank
34th

Regulatory Quality over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Egypt
00.10.20.3199620032011

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 0.1617 standard error against 0.1617 standard error in Egypt, a difference of 0 standard error.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 34th and Egypt ranks 34th of 53 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Egypt Difference Ahead
1990s 0.294 standard error 0.269 standard error 0.0249 standard error Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 0.1866 standard error 0.1792 standard error 0.0074 standard error Cote d'Ivoire
2010s 0.1617 standard error 0.1617 standard error 0 standard error

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality, Cote d'Ivoire or Egypt?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 0.1617 standard error against 0.1617 standard error in Egypt as of 2011.
What is the difference in regulatory quality between Cote d'Ivoire and Egypt?
0 standard error, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Egypt?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Egypt rank globally for regulatory quality?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 34th and Egypt ranks 34th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.