Central African Republic vs Namibia: Regulatory Quality
Regulatory Quality over time
- Central African Republic
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.1683 standard error against 0.1673 standard error in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.001 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 24th and Namibia ranks 21st of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4034 standard error | 0.294 standard error | 0.1094 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 0.2159 standard error | 0.1849 standard error | 0.031 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0.1681 standard error | 0.1691 standard error | 0.0009 standard error | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality, Central African Republic or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.1683 standard error against 0.1673 standard error in Central African Republic as of 2011.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality between Central African Republic and Namibia?
- 0.001 standard error, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Namibia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Namibia rank globally for regulatory quality?
- Central African Republic ranks 24th and Namibia ranks 21st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.