Central African Republic vs Chad: Regulatory Quality
Regulatory Quality over time
- Central African Republic
- Chad
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 0.1673 standard error against 0.1645 standard error in Chad, a difference of 0.0028 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 24th and Chad ranks 25th of 53 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4034 standard error | 0.3643 standard error | 0.0391 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 0.2159 standard error | 0.2012 standard error | 0.0147 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0.1681 standard error | 0.1655 standard error | 0.0027 standard error | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality, Central African Republic or Chad?
- Central African Republic, at 0.1673 standard error against 0.1645 standard error in Chad as of 2011.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality between Central African Republic and Chad?
- 0.0028 standard error, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Chad?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Chad rank globally for regulatory quality?
- Central African Republic ranks 24th and Chad ranks 25th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.