Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Regulatory Quality
Regulatory Quality over time
- Cape Verde
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.1991 standard error against 0.1944 standard error in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0047 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 8th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.532 standard error | 0.3145 standard error | 0.2175 standard error | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 0.2342 standard error | 0.2183 standard error | 0.0159 standard error | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 0.1946 standard error | 0.199 standard error | 0.0044 standard error | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality, Cape Verde or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.1991 standard error against 0.1944 standard error in Cape Verde as of 2011.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality between Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0047 standard error, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for regulatory quality?
- Cape Verde ranks 8th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Regulatory Quality (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.REGL.LA.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.