China vs Latvia: Regulatory Quality - Standard error of the governance estimate
China
0.1969
in 2025
Latvia
0.1969
in 2025
China rank
118th
Latvia rank
118th
Regulatory Quality - Standard error of the governance estimate over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 0.1969 against 0.1969 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Latvia ahead.
China ranks 118th and Latvia ranks 118th of 206 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2377 | 0.2528 | 0.015 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.2092 | 0.2126 | 0.0035 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.1923 | 0.2085 | 0.0162 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.194 | 0.1994 | 0.0054 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - standard error of the governance estimate, China or Latvia?
- China, at 0.1969 against 0.1969 in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - standard error of the governance estimate between China and Latvia?
- 0, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for regulatory quality - standard error of the governance estimate?
- China ranks 118th and Latvia ranks 118th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Regulatory Quality - Standard error of the governance estimate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.