China vs Latvia: Regulatory Quality - Number of sources
China
9
in 2024
Latvia
9
in 2024
China rank
47th
Latvia rank
47th
Regulatory Quality - Number of sources over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 9 against 9 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was China ahead.
China ranks 47th and Latvia ranks 47th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6 | 4.5 | 1.5 | China |
| 2000s | 7.56 | 7.89 | 0.3333 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 8.9 | 8.4 | 0.5 | China |
| 2020s | 8.8 | 8 | 0.8 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - number of sources, China or Latvia?
- China, at 9 against 9 in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - number of sources between China and Latvia?
- 0, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for regulatory quality - number of sources?
- China ranks 47th and Latvia ranks 47th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Regulatory Quality - Number of sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.