Sri Lanka vs Vanuatu: Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100)
Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 50.27 0-100 against 49.64 0-100 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.63 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 121st and Vanuatu ranks 123rd of 206 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.52 0-100 | 47.77 0-100 | 5.76 0-100 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 54.96 0-100 | 48.39 0-100 | 6.57 0-100 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 50.48 0-100 | 48.79 0-100 | 1.7 0-100 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Sri Lanka or Vanuatu?
- Sri Lanka, at 50.27 0-100 against 49.64 0-100 in Vanuatu as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Sri Lanka and Vanuatu?
- 0.63 0-100, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Vanuatu?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and Vanuatu rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Sri Lanka ranks 121st and Vanuatu ranks 123rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).