South Sudan vs Turkmenistan: Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100)
Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100) over time
- South Sudan
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 23.13 0-100 against 22.5 0-100 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.63 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 203rd and Turkmenistan ranks 202nd of 206 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25.87 0-100 | 24.24 0-100 | 1.63 0-100 | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 21.49 0-100 | 24.56 0-100 | 3.07 0-100 | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, South Sudan or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 23.13 0-100 against 22.5 0-100 in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between South Sudan and Turkmenistan?
- 0.63 0-100, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Turkmenistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do South Sudan and Turkmenistan rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- South Sudan ranks 203rd and Turkmenistan ranks 202nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).