Rwanda vs Saint Lucia: Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100)
Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100) over time
- Rwanda
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 59.88 0-100 against 59.3 0-100 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.58 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Rwanda ranks 76th and Saint Lucia ranks 77th of 206 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.52 0-100 | 64.43 0-100 | 18.91 0-100 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 55.52 0-100 | 63.17 0-100 | 7.65 0-100 | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 58.72 0-100 | 59.1 0-100 | 0.3818 0-100 | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Rwanda or Saint Lucia?
- Rwanda, at 59.88 0-100 against 59.3 0-100 in Saint Lucia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Rwanda and Saint Lucia?
- 0.58 0-100, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Saint Lucia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Rwanda and Saint Lucia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Rwanda ranks 76th and Saint Lucia ranks 77th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).