Romania vs Seychelles: Regulatory Quality - Governance score
Regulatory Quality - Governance score over time
- Romania
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 61.01 0-100 against 60.91 0-100 in Romania, a difference of 0.1 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Seychelles ahead.
Romania ranks 68th and Seychelles ranks 67th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 3 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 51.38 0-100 | 57.85 0-100 | 6.48 0-100 | Seychelles |
| 2000s | 55.94 0-100 | 55.52 0-100 | 0.4142 0-100 | Romania |
| 2010s | 61.08 0-100 | 57.65 0-100 | 3.43 0-100 | Romania |
| 2020s | 60.35 0-100 | 60.19 0-100 | 0.1562 0-100 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Romania or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 61.01 0-100 against 60.91 0-100 in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Romania and Seychelles?
- 0.1 0-100, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Seychelles?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Romania and Seychelles rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Romania ranks 68th and Seychelles ranks 67th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).