Oman vs San Marino: Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100)
Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100) over time
- Oman
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 70.13 0-100 against 67.42 0-100 in Oman, a difference of 2.71 0-100.
Across all 11 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Oman ranks 43rd and San Marino ranks 40th of 206 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 66.11 0-100 | 70.37 0-100 | 4.26 0-100 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 64.85 0-100 | 70.25 0-100 | 5.4 0-100 | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Oman or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 70.13 0-100 against 67.42 0-100 in Oman as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Oman and San Marino?
- 2.71 0-100, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and San Marino?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Oman and San Marino rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Oman ranks 43rd and San Marino ranks 40th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).