Montenegro vs Namibia: Regulatory Quality - Governance score
Regulatory Quality - Governance score over time
- Montenegro
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 56.99 0-100 against 56.87 0-100 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.12 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Namibia ahead.
Montenegro ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 79th of 205 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.89 0-100 | 58.47 0-100 | 5.57 0-100 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 57.5 0-100 | 57.1 0-100 | 0.4019 0-100 | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 58.18 0-100 | 56.53 0-100 | 1.65 0-100 | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Montenegro or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 56.99 0-100 against 56.87 0-100 in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Montenegro and Namibia?
- 0.12 0-100, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Montenegro and Namibia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Montenegro ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 79th of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).