Monaco vs United Arab Emirates: Regulatory Quality - Governance score
Regulatory Quality - Governance score over time
- Monaco
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 72.62 0-100 against 72.25 0-100 in Monaco, a difference of 0.37 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Monaco ahead.
Monaco ranks 30th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 204 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 76.08 0-100 | 72.51 0-100 | 3.57 0-100 | Monaco |
| 2020s | 75.25 0-100 | 71.95 0-100 | 3.3 0-100 | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Monaco or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 72.62 0-100 against 72.25 0-100 in Monaco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Monaco and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.37 0-100, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and United Arab Emirates?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Monaco and United Arab Emirates rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Monaco ranks 30th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).