Marshall Islands vs East Timor: Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100)
Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100) over time
- Marshall Islands
- East Timor
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 42.91 0-100 against 42.89 0-100 in East Timor, a difference of 0.02 0-100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 157th and East Timor ranks 158th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Marshall Islands averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.89 0-100 | 34.71 0-100 | 6.17 0-100 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 39.41 0-100 | 39.35 0-100 | 0.0625 0-100 | Marshall Islands |
| 2020s | 40.93 0-100 | 41.55 0-100 | 0.6228 0-100 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Marshall Islands or East Timor?
- Marshall Islands, at 42.91 0-100 against 42.89 0-100 in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Marshall Islands and East Timor?
- 0.02 0-100, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and East Timor?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Marshall Islands and East Timor rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 157th and East Timor ranks 158th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).