Mali vs Suriname: Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100)
Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100) over time
- Mali
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 41.8 0-100 against 41.58 0-100 in Mali, a difference of 0.22 0-100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 167th and Suriname ranks 165th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44.58 0-100 | 38.6 0-100 | 5.98 0-100 | Mali |
| 2000s | 48.33 0-100 | 43.9 0-100 | 4.44 0-100 | Mali |
| 2010s | 45.56 0-100 | 46.37 0-100 | 0.8154 0-100 | Suriname |
| 2020s | 42.88 0-100 | 42.5 0-100 | 0.378 0-100 | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Mali or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 41.8 0-100 against 41.58 0-100 in Mali as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Mali and Suriname?
- 0.22 0-100, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Suriname?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Mali and Suriname rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Mali ranks 167th and Suriname ranks 165th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).