Malawi vs Uzbekistan: Regulatory Quality - Governance score
Regulatory Quality - Governance score over time
- Malawi
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 46.56 0-100 against 45.64 0-100 in Malawi, a difference of 0.92 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 143rd and Uzbekistan ranks 140th of 204 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.14 0-100 | 24.43 0-100 | 24.71 0-100 | Malawi |
| 2000s | 45.99 0-100 | 29.04 0-100 | 16.96 0-100 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 44.46 0-100 | 33.34 0-100 | 11.11 0-100 | Malawi |
| 2020s | 44.17 0-100 | 43.62 0-100 | 0.5475 0-100 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Malawi or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 46.56 0-100 against 45.64 0-100 in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Malawi and Uzbekistan?
- 0.92 0-100, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uzbekistan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Uzbekistan rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Malawi ranks 143rd and Uzbekistan ranks 140th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).