Greenland vs United Kingdom: Regulatory Quality - Governance score
Regulatory Quality - Governance score over time
- Greenland
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 78.7 0-100 against 78.58 0-100 in Greenland, a difference of 0.12 0-100.
Across all 16 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 15th and United Kingdom ranks 14th of 204 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.65 0-100 | 79.14 0-100 | 0.49 0-100 | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 78.6 0-100 | 81.31 0-100 | 2.71 0-100 | United Kingdom |
| 2020s | 77.66 0-100 | 79.94 0-100 | 2.28 0-100 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Greenland or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 78.7 0-100 against 78.58 0-100 in Greenland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Greenland and United Kingdom?
- 0.12 0-100, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and United Kingdom?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Greenland and United Kingdom rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Greenland ranks 15th and United Kingdom ranks 14th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).