Gabon vs Marshall Islands: Regulatory Quality - Governance score
Regulatory Quality - Governance score over time
- Gabon
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 44.02 0-100 against 43.45 0-100 in Gabon, a difference of 0.57 0-100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gabon ahead.
Gabon ranks 153rd and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 204 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.47 0-100 | 41.22 0-100 | 6.26 0-100 | Gabon |
| 2010s | 44.89 0-100 | 40.13 0-100 | 4.75 0-100 | Gabon |
| 2020s | 42.38 0-100 | 41.27 0-100 | 1.11 0-100 | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Gabon or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at 44.02 0-100 against 43.45 0-100 in Gabon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Gabon and Marshall Islands?
- 0.57 0-100, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Marshall Islands?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Gabon and Marshall Islands rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Gabon ranks 153rd and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).