Finland vs Hong Kong: Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100)

Finland
83.62 0-100
in 2025
Hong Kong
83.33 0-100
in 2025
Finland rank
7th
Hong Kong rank
9th

Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100) over time

  • Finland
  • Hong Kong
020406080100199620102025

How they compare

Finland currently reports 83.62 0-100 against 83.33 0-100 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.29 0-100.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Finland ranks 7th and Hong Kong ranks 9th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1990s 81.9 0-100 78.81 0-100 3.08 0-100 Finland
2000s 88.28 0-100 89.58 0-100 1.31 0-100 Hong Kong
2010s 88.48 0-100 90.64 0-100 2.17 0-100 Hong Kong
2020s 87.41 0-100 84.77 0-100 2.64 0-100 Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Finland or Hong Kong?
Finland, at 83.62 0-100 against 83.33 0-100 in Hong Kong as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Finland and Hong Kong?
0.29 0-100, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Hong Kong?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Finland and Hong Kong rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
Finland ranks 7th and Hong Kong ranks 9th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Hong Kong: Regulatory Quality - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-score-0-100/finland/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-score-0-100/finland/hong-kong-sar-china/">Finland vs Hong Kong: Regulatory Quality - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).