Eritrea vs South Sudan: Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100)
Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100) over time
- Eritrea
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 22.5 0-100 against 19.24 0-100 in Eritrea, a difference of 3.26 0-100.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Eritrea's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 206th and South Sudan ranks 203rd of 206 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.82 0-100 | 25.87 0-100 | 4.05 0-100 | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 20.13 0-100 | 21.49 0-100 | 1.36 0-100 | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Eritrea or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 22.5 0-100 against 19.24 0-100 in Eritrea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 3.26 0-100, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Eritrea and South Sudan rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Eritrea ranks 206th and South Sudan ranks 203rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).