Costa Rica vs Palau: Regulatory Quality - Governance score
Regulatory Quality - Governance score over time
- Costa Rica
- Palau
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 64.04 0-100 against 62.45 0-100 in Palau, a difference of 1.59 0-100.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 56th and Palau ranks 58th of 204 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.56 0-100 | 43.14 0-100 | 23.41 0-100 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 64.77 0-100 | 53.37 0-100 | 11.4 0-100 | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 63.85 0-100 | 61.39 0-100 | 2.46 0-100 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Costa Rica or Palau?
- Costa Rica, at 64.04 0-100 against 62.45 0-100 in Palau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Costa Rica and Palau?
- 1.59 0-100, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Palau?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Palau rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Costa Rica ranks 56th and Palau ranks 58th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).