Central African Republic vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100)

Central African Republic
32.98 0-100
in 2025
Democratic Republic of Congo
32.95 0-100
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
189th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
190th

Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
10203040199620102025

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 32.98 0-100 against 32.95 0-100 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.03 0-100.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 189th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 190th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 3 and Democratic Republic of Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 30.98 0-100 15.68 0-100 15.3 0-100 Central African Republic
2000s 32.46 0-100 25.87 0-100 6.59 0-100 Central African Republic
2010s 32.6 0-100 32.18 0-100 0.4255 0-100 Central African Republic
2020s 32.4 0-100 32.44 0-100 0.0415 0-100 Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Central African Republic or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Central African Republic, at 32.98 0-100 against 32.95 0-100 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo?
0.03 0-100, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
Central African Republic ranks 189th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 190th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Regulatory Quality - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-score-0-100/central-african-republic/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-score-0-100/central-african-republic/congo-dem-rep/">Central African Republic vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Regulatory Quality - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).