Cameroon vs East Timor: Regulatory Quality - Governance score
Regulatory Quality - Governance score over time
- Cameroon
- East Timor
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 43.37 0-100 against 43.28 0-100 in East Timor, a difference of 0.09 0-100.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 155th and East Timor ranks 156th of 205 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.49 0-100 | 34.89 0-100 | 6.6 0-100 | Cameroon |
| 2010s | 42.24 0-100 | 39.73 0-100 | 2.51 0-100 | Cameroon |
| 2020s | 42.92 0-100 | 41.96 0-100 | 0.9582 0-100 | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Cameroon or East Timor?
- Cameroon, at 43.37 0-100 against 43.28 0-100 in East Timor as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Cameroon and East Timor?
- 0.09 0-100, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and East Timor?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cameroon and East Timor rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Cameroon ranks 155th and East Timor ranks 156th of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).