Bermuda vs Costa Rica: Regulatory Quality - Governance score
Regulatory Quality - Governance score over time
- Bermuda
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 64.78 0-100 against 64.04 0-100 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.74 0-100.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Bermuda has been ahead every year.
Bermuda ranks 54th and Costa Rica ranks 56th of 204 countries.
Bermuda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.46 0-100 | 60.39 0-100 | 17.07 0-100 | Bermuda |
| 2000s | 77.45 0-100 | 64.25 0-100 | 13.2 0-100 | Bermuda |
| 2010s | 71.54 0-100 | 64.77 0-100 | 6.77 0-100 | Bermuda |
| 2020s | 67.04 0-100 | 63.85 0-100 | 3.19 0-100 | Bermuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Bermuda or Costa Rica?
- Bermuda, at 64.78 0-100 against 64.04 0-100 in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Bermuda and Costa Rica?
- 0.74 0-100, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Costa Rica?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Bermuda and Costa Rica rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- Bermuda ranks 54th and Costa Rica ranks 56th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).