Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Regulatory Quality - Governance score

Bangladesh
39.88 0-100
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
40.81 0-100
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
175th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
172nd

Regulatory Quality - Governance score over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0204060199620102024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 40.81 0-100 against 39.88 0-100 in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.93 0-100.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 175th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 172nd of 205 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 36.65 0-100 43.85 0-100 7.2 0-100 Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 39.29 0-100 43.87 0-100 4.58 0-100 Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 41.55 0-100 42.53 0-100 0.9804 0-100 Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 40.54 0-100 41.48 0-100 0.9368 0-100 Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, Bangladesh or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 40.81 0-100 against 39.88 0-100 in Bangladesh as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.93 0-100, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
Bangladesh ranks 175th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 172nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Regulatory Quality - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-score-0-100/bangladesh/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-score-0-100/bangladesh/sao-tome-and-principe/">Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Regulatory Quality - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 5,160 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).