American Samoa vs Malta: Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100)
Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100) (Regulatory score 0-100) over time
- American Samoa
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 62.53 0-100 against 61.94 0-100 in American Samoa, a difference of 0.59 0-100.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
American Samoa ranks 65th and Malta ranks 62nd of 206 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.83 0-100 | 77.29 0-100 | 13.46 0-100 | Malta |
| 2010s | 59.65 0-100 | 75.19 0-100 | 15.54 0-100 | Malta |
| 2020s | 62.06 0-100 | 66.95 0-100 | 4.88 0-100 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance score, American Samoa or Malta?
- Malta, at 62.53 0-100 against 61.94 0-100 in American Samoa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance score between American Samoa and Malta?
- 0.59 0-100, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Malta?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do American Samoa and Malta rank globally for regulatory quality - governance score?
- American Samoa ranks 65th and Malta ranks 62nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).