Tunisia vs Vanuatu: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Tunisia
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports -0.3248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3901 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0653 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tunisia ahead.
Tunisia ranks 126th and Vanuatu ranks 123rd of 204 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tunisia | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1307 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | -0.2131 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4147 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | -0.2935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Tunisia or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at -0.3248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3901 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Tunisia and Vanuatu?
- 0.0653 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Vanuatu?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Tunisia and Vanuatu rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Tunisia ranks 126th and Vanuatu ranks 123rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.