Tonga vs Turkey: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Tonga
- Turkey
How they compare
Tonga currently reports -0.1945 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2112 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Turkey, a difference of 0.0167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Turkey ahead.
Tonga ranks 109th and Turkey ranks 112th of 204 countries.
Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tonga | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.7009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2341 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Turkey |
| 2010s | -0.3182 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5808 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Turkey |
| 2020s | -0.2736 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Tonga or Turkey?
- Tonga, at -0.1945 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2112 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Turkey as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Tonga and Turkey?
- 0.0167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Turkey?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Tonga and Turkey rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Tonga ranks 109th and Turkey ranks 112th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.