South Sudan vs Venezuela: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- South Sudan
- Venezuela
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports -1.92 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Venezuela, a difference of 0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Venezuela ahead.
South Sudan ranks 203rd and Venezuela ranks 204th of 206 countries.
Venezuela has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Venezuela | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0199 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Venezuela |
| 2020s | -1.98 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.96 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0139 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Venezuela |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, South Sudan or Venezuela?
- South Sudan, at -1.92 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Venezuela as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between South Sudan and Venezuela?
- 0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Venezuela?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do South Sudan and Venezuela rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- South Sudan ranks 203rd and Venezuela ranks 204th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.