South Sudan vs Syria: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- South Sudan
- Syria
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports -1.93 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Syria, a difference of 0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Syria ahead.
South Sudan ranks 202nd and Syria ranks 203rd of 204 countries.
Syria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2042 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Syria |
| 2020s | -1.95 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.84 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Syria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, South Sudan or Syria?
- South Sudan, at -1.93 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Syria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between South Sudan and Syria?
- 0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Syria?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Syria rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- South Sudan ranks 202nd and Syria ranks 203rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.