Sao Tome and Principe vs Solomon Islands: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Sao Tome and Principe
-0.8909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Solomon Islands
-0.8885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe rank
171st
Solomon Islands rank
170th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Solomon Islands
-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4199620102024

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports -0.8885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st and Solomon Islands ranks 170th of 204 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s -0.8016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe
2010s -0.7821 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9739 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1917 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe
2020s -0.8487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1466 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Sao Tome and Principe or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at -0.8885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Sao Tome and Principe and Solomon Islands?
0.0024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Solomon Islands?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Solomon Islands rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st and Solomon Islands ranks 170th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Solomon Islands: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/sao-tome-and-principe/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/sao-tome-and-principe/solomon-islands/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Solomon Islands: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.