San Marino vs Slovenia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- San Marino
- Slovenia
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 0.8653 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7982 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes San Marino's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was San Marino ahead.
San Marino ranks 40th and Slovenia ranks 41st of 204 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.8715 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6721 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1995 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 0.8666 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7964 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0702 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, San Marino or Slovenia?
- San Marino, at 0.8653 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7982 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between San Marino and Slovenia?
- 0.0671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Slovenia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do San Marino and Slovenia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- San Marino ranks 40th and Slovenia ranks 41st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.