Russian Federation vs Zimbabwe: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Russian Federation
-1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Zimbabwe
-1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Russian Federation rank
179th
Zimbabwe rank
182nd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Zimbabwe
-2.5-2-1.5-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Russian Federation ranks 179th and Zimbabwe ranks 182nd of 204 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s -0.7208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Russian Federation
2000s -0.3296 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.97 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Russian Federation
2010s -0.4079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Russian Federation
2020s -0.7332 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Russian Federation or Zimbabwe?
Russian Federation, at -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Russian Federation and Zimbabwe?
0.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Russian Federation and Zimbabwe rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Russian Federation ranks 179th and Zimbabwe ranks 182nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Zimbabwe: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/russian-federation/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/russian-federation/zimbabwe/">Russian Federation vs Zimbabwe: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.