Philippines vs Thailand: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Philippines
0.172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Thailand
0.1244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Philippines rank
81st
Thailand rank
83rd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Philippines
  • Thailand
-0.100.10.20.3199620102025

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 0.172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Thailand, a difference of 0.0476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.4 times Thailand's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Philippines ahead.

Philippines ranks 81st and Thailand ranks 83rd of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Thailand Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1428 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0252 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.168 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Philippines
2000s 0.0379 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1683 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1304 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand
2010s 0.0902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0601 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand
2020s 0.0867 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.121 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Philippines or Thailand?
Philippines, at 0.172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Thailand as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Philippines and Thailand?
0.0476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Thailand?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Philippines and Thailand rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Philippines ranks 81st and Thailand ranks 83rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Thailand: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/philippines/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/philippines/thailand/">Philippines vs Thailand: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.