Papua New Guinea vs Uganda: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Papua New Guinea
-0.6137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Uganda
-0.5935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
145th
Uganda rank
144th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Uganda
-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-0199620102025

How they compare

Uganda currently reports -0.5935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Uganda ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 145th and Uganda ranks 144th of 206 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s -0.7345 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.091 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Uganda
2000s -0.6132 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2612 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Uganda
2010s -0.4285 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3905 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.038 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Uganda
2020s -0.6593 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5088 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1506 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Papua New Guinea or Uganda?
Uganda, at -0.5935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Papua New Guinea and Uganda?
0.0202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Uganda?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Papua New Guinea and Uganda rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Papua New Guinea ranks 145th and Uganda ranks 144th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Uganda: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/papua-new-guinea/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/papua-new-guinea/uganda/">Papua New Guinea vs Uganda: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.