North Macedonia vs Uruguay: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- North Macedonia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.5522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0979 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 57th and Uruguay ranks 55th of 206 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.5141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Uruguay |
| 2000s | -0.0666 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4804 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.2033 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6308 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4275 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.3506 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, North Macedonia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.5522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between North Macedonia and Uruguay?
- 0.0979 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Uruguay?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do North Macedonia and Uruguay rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- North Macedonia ranks 57th and Uruguay ranks 55th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.