North Macedonia vs Rwanda: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- North Macedonia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.2696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0033 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 73rd of 204 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.5701 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | -0.0957 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7459 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 0.1915 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 0.2435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1866 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0569 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, North Macedonia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0.2696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between North Macedonia and Rwanda?
- 0.0033 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Rwanda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Rwanda rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- North Macedonia ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 73rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.