New Zealand vs Singapore: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

New Zealand
1.84 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Singapore
2.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
New Zealand rank
4th
Singapore rank
1st

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • New Zealand
  • Singapore
00.511.52199620102024

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 2.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.84 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Singapore ahead.

New Zealand ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 1st of 204 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.87 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore
2000s 1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2118 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore
2010s 1.97 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1506 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore
2020s 1.87 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, New Zealand or Singapore?
Singapore, at 2.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.84 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between New Zealand and Singapore?
0.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Singapore?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Singapore rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
New Zealand ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 1st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Singapore: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/new-zealand/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/new-zealand/singapore/">New Zealand vs Singapore: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.