Nepal vs Tanzania: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Nepal
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports -0.5354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nepal, a difference of 0.0169 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 142nd and Tanzania ranks 141st of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.6278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5899 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tanzania |
| 2000s | -0.615 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5168 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0981 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tanzania |
| 2010s | -0.7135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.494 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2195 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tanzania |
| 2020s | -0.6116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Nepal or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at -0.5354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Nepal and Tanzania?
- 0.0169 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Tanzania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Tanzania rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Nepal ranks 142nd and Tanzania ranks 141st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.