Nauru vs Uganda: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Nauru
- Uganda
How they compare
Nauru currently reports -0.5761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Uganda, a difference of 0.0174 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Uganda ahead.
Nauru ranks 141st and Uganda ranks 144th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.7269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Uganda |
| 2010s | -0.6381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3905 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2477 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Uganda |
| 2020s | -0.4631 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5088 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Nauru or Uganda?
- Nauru, at -0.5761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Uganda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Nauru and Uganda?
- 0.0174 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Uganda?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
- How do Nauru and Uganda rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Nauru ranks 141st and Uganda ranks 144th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.