Nauru vs Tunisia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Nauru
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports -0.525 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nauru, a difference of 0.0511 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 141st and Tunisia ranks 139th of 206 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.7269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | -0.6381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3875 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | -0.4631 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3524 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Nauru or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at -0.525 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nauru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Nauru and Tunisia?
- 0.0511 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tunisia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
- How do Nauru and Tunisia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Nauru ranks 141st and Tunisia ranks 139th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.